This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
This article is a part of WikiProject Extinction, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on extinction and extinct organisms. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.ExtinctionWikipedia:WikiProject ExtinctionTemplate:WikiProject ExtinctionExtinction articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Would it be possible if someone could have the courtesy to explain exactly what's wrong with the reconstructions beyond giving the extraordinarily vague adjective of "amateurish," so I can attempt to improve my pictures before they are removed from the article?--Mr Fink (talk) 21:53, 1 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Dont listen to full blown, money-heavy professional guys when talking about image quality. They only see how good theirs is and not how good yours is to the people here. --User:piatnitskysaurus (talk)sun 3rd of August(UTC)
