Talk:Melanthera biflora

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Overseas France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Overseas France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Overseas FranceWikipedia:WikiProject Overseas FranceTemplate:WikiProject Overseas FranceOverseas France articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plants Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

On article title

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi to anyone reading! I'm writing to say that it seems like Plants of the World Online and World Flora Online prefer Wollastonia biflora as the targetted botanical name compared to the present title M. biflora. When I typed in Melanthera biflora in both those sources, they tell me to redirect to Wollastonia.

When I click M. Biflora in POWO
When I click M. Biflora in WFO

This article might need to be moved to the Wollastonia name following the two. Would that be OK? There's also the problem of the W. biflora link itself being a redirect. I'm putting this out there to any editors who can help with this sort of thing. Thank you for your time. 🙏 -- Mat Kiyan (talk) 11:08, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic