 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Melbourne United. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140520221210/http://www.nbl.com.au/article/id/4qa686e1qc361iqjarbr2bccu to http://www.nbl.com.au/article/id/4qa686e1qc361iqjarbr2bccu
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150528144855/http://www.melbourneutd.com.au/article/id/l0q2h8cxpfa41i03l8pyrraw9 to http://www.melbourneutd.com.au/article/id/l0q2h8cxpfa41i03l8pyrraw9
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141224084419/http://www.melbourneutd.com.au/history to http://www.melbourneutd.com.au/history
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:10, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Club colours
editIs there any evidence that United have used grey as one of their colours in recent years? Looking back over the history of the page, grey has never been listed as an official colour and I don't recall it being used by the club in social media content or on their website over the last season or two. DylanI00 (talk) 07:51, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- Apart from the grey lines in the logo, you are probably right. Grey as the third colour looks better for the infobox as it stands out compared to blue against navy, but their website does have the blue prominent around the menu tab so I say just keep it as it is now. DaHuzyBru (talk) 08:43, 25 May 2020 (UTC)