| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Untitled
editWalloon or Wallonian?
Which is the correct adjective, both seem to be in use.... Thanks!Evilbu 19:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- I honestly don't know which is the correct adjective, but the article on the Walloons says that "when referring to inhabitants of Wallonia with the meaning of citizen of Wallonia, the word Wallonian is more commonly used." Still, that does not say which adjective is preferable in the sense I used it. After all, by that definition a Dutch-speaking resident of the Walloon Region would also be a "Wallonian". I personally think both are acceptable, though perhaps "Walloon" refers more to the actual people and "Wallonian" to the inhabitants of the Walloon Region. In which case "Walloon" would be preferable here. I'll change "Wallonian" to "Walloon" just to make sure, but I hope someone else can clarify which adjective is correct. --Ganchelkas 15:52, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Controversy
Wathelet didn´t help in the case of Andras Pandy either, I wonder if he really was that incompetent or else.
https://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-8810387.html
One of several german sources. --31.18.31.53 (talk) 19:48, 9 December 2019 (UTC)