Talk:Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lead

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article lead is currently pretty confusing. It should be written in a more concise and clearer manner (read: smaller words, fewer legal citations). The rest of the article is where you can get into the finer details. :-) --MZMcBride (talk) 13:58, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

"Snitch" in first sentence

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I don't think snitch is the proper term for that. Maybe "Informant" would be better? GoogolplexForce (talk) 01:04, 4 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Forgot: if someone doesn't disagree within a week, I'll change it. Feel free to revert me if you've a good reason. GoogolplexForce (talk) 01:05, 4 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

United States v. Kirby (1899)

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've removed the link to United States v. Kirby because the link is to the wrong case - I wasn't able to find an article about the 1899 United States v. Kirby - if there is one, somebody please make a link to the correct article. CruiserBob (talk) 21:47, 8 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100119044033/http://www.scotusblog.com/argument-analysis-as-kennedy-goes/ to http://www.scotusblog.com/argument-analysis-as-kennedy-goes/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:47, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic