Talk:Member check

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

This article should be merged into Qualitative research. It has no references and a google check didn't find anything under Member check related to this topic.— Ѕandahl 02:55, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

When you google, search on "member check" qualitative and you will find tons of material, especially of you search in http://scholar.google.com . The references were apparently accidently deleted and have been restored. The qualitative research page definitely needs much more development as well as more links to related and supporting topics. If the rapidly growing material on member checks (respondent validation) is put into the qualitative research page, it will completely overwhelm it. How about this: After I am through with the member check area, I will work on the qualitative research area and expand it by adding missing sections and topics? --ProfLG (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply


I notice quite a few new editors editing this with no contributions outside this topic [1].— Ѕandahl 19:59, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Member check. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply