Talk:Members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors

Records of the Board of Supervisors

Just anonymously I would like to say it is erroneous to assert that all records of the Board of Supervisors have been lost. If one would but do a little research, especially in the San Francisco Call newspaper, a slew of records can be found about several interesting and illustrious supervisors before and after the 1906 Earthquake. 108.178.145.48 (talk) 04:08, 14 January 2013 (UTC) P.S. you also might want to try the Online Archive of California for some really good photos.

Chart of transitions

The chart of transitions has been added back because it contains information not in the other chart on the page. The suggestion to simply add those details to individual pages on members of the Board of Supervisors is appreciated, but is not as good a solution as having both charts. Not all members have Wikipedia pages (and not all should), and the chart itself conveys a sequence of information that would be lost if the information were dispersed into several dozen articles on individuals (and even more as more detail is added on members further in the past). Circumspect (talk) 23:45, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Align names to tops of sections . . .

I propose that the names of the supervisors in the charts be aligned to the top of the columns, just as is done in Los Angeles City Council#1925 and after (fifteen districts). You do this by replacing |- valign=center with |- valign=top in the markup. As you can see, in the Los Angeles chart it is much easier to discern when the representatives' terms begin and when they end. What do you say? If there is no objection, I or somebody else will make the necessary changes. Any thoughts? Yours sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 16:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714133409/http://library2.municode.com/4201/home.htm?view=home&doc_action=setdoc&doc_keytype=tocid&doc_key=591a1e3e8829309f551ac9e1da49b67b to http://library2.municode.com/4201/home.htm?view=home&doc_action=setdoc&doc_keytype=tocid&doc_key=591a1e3e8829309f551ac9e1da49b67b
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061126210602/http://www.municode.com/content/4201/14130/HTML/ch013.html to http://www.municode.com/content/4201/14130/HTML/ch013.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:25, 25 January 2018 (UTC)