Talk:Membrane paradigm
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Keeping it real
editThe entire "what is reality" section seems like speculation, and doesn't belong here. Ken Arromdee 07:50, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
So I've deleted it. At least until someone can come up with a source which says "The use of this argument to support general relativity is problematic.". Ken Arromdee 19:43, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
Wrong article
editThis article is not about membrane paradigm, but about holographic principle (a completely different thing).--213.141.159.52 07:59, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, I was suprised to see them linked together. --Michael C. Price talk 13:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Unless anyone objects I shall delete the holographic principle related stuff here. --Michael C. Price talk 09:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Magnetic field lines
editBe nice to see a mention of the above as well. Are they locked onto the membrane, for example. And what relevance has this for quasars? --Michael C. Price talk 13:59, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Different Credit?
editKip Thorne himself credits Hanni and Ruffini for the membrane paradigm. Why the disagreement? Jlodman (talk) 02:49, 17 October 2010 (UTC)