Talk:Memorial to the Women of the Confederacy
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Memorial to the Women of the Confederacy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131230233722/http://hqudc.org/business_office_mem_bldg/ to http://hqudc.org/business_office_mem_bldg/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131230233723/http://www.hqudc.org/business_office_mem_bldg/index.htm to http://www.hqudc.org/business_office_mem_bldg/index.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131230233919/http://hqudc.org/Libraries_Research/index.htm to http://hqudc.org/Libraries_Research/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Self-sourcing
editPer normal Wikipedia practice, we need independent sources to establish that something is significant. The building certainly is, but the various rooms within in it are not unless there are reliable independent secondary sources saying so - this is to prevent the abuse of Wikipedia for promotional purposes and is normal practice in all articles, not just those on controversial subjects. Guy (Help!) 12:17, 5 January 2019 (UTC)