This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mental health law is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles
I feel that this article is a bit misleading. There are aspects of the law dealing with mental health beyond statutes about treatment and restraint of mentally ill persons. In common law jurisdictions, there are available to defendants in criminal cases the defences of insanity as well as sane and insane automatism, both of which could be regarded as falling within the umbrella of mental health law, but are not necessarily codified. They are codified in my state, but only because there is a criminal code. However, more in keeping with the current text of this article, we also have statutes dealing with the powers of courts to send defendants for assessment for fitness to stand trial, making hospital orders etc. I will research and try to add to this article. - Mark 08:14, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)Mark
Dear Mark, exactly why I wanted a lawyer to look at the article and many thanks for doing so. I didn't even know if "codify" was used correctly. In creating this stub I wanted to unify aspects of the law that related to mental health to create an entry point for anyone interested in that area. At the time I only thought of the provisions that one usually finds in a mental health act. However, as you so correctly point out, McNaghten rules, mens rea and a host of other legal issues are also part of this. I have gone around the law articles adding "Mental health law" as a category to those articles I have found. I have reworded the main article but please do so yourself, or indeed anyone else. I have made a link to automatism (law) which is currently empty. The link to automatism refers to a technique in literature. If you have the time you might want to create an entry for that. --CloudSurfer 19:02, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Hhelvink.
I'm a student editor in PJHC394 Human Development in Local and Global Communities at Rice University, and I'm considering expanding this article. I've collected a set of references I may lean on for this article on my user page. Gvacaliuc (talk) 03:42, 31 January 2019 (UTC)Reply