Talk:Mercedes-AMG GT
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Oknevermind in topic Not a true grand tourer
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mercedes-AMG GT article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Acceleration numbers
editJaredclce, it's just a misunderstanding: both times are right, but the MB USA ones you quoted are for the 0-60 mph, mine from the Daimler press release are for the 0-100 km/h. However for an European car we'd better use the latter. – Cloverleaf II (talk) 15:50, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, my bad -- I should have noticed that! I'm of the opinion we should use 0-60 mph, or at least mention it somewhere if you want to use the kph. Both work for me. Jaredclce (talk) 15:54, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- I've checked out WP:AUTOCONV, seems 0-100 km/h is the preferred measurement. Now that we're at it, what's the best way to cite the reference for the whole table? – Cloverleaf II (talk) 16:03, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- Ok. I'm actually not sure about how to cite the reference for the whole table in the most effective way. I'll think about it though. Jaredclce (talk) 16:04, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Not a true grand tourer
editTechnically this is a true mid-engined sports car. Given its nimble handling and effectiveness on track, nobody who has driven the AMG GT (including the base model) would think this is a grand tourer. Oknevermind (talk) 06:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)