Talk:Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class

Untitled

I have read that the name could be MLK-Class

MLKX

Is "MLKX-Class" a typo or what? --SFoskett July 1, 2005 18:33 (UTC)

Obviously it's a typo.

Obviously it's not, because it got moved there. I think it should either be X or MLK but not MLKX, unless there's more reason than is mentioned. —MICLER (Talk) 22:22, August 6, 2005 (UTC)

Well if the guy wanted to move to MLK-Class, and forgot to remove the X, once the move is validated it is difficult to undo, so it could still be a typo, sort of ... Hektor 19:47, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

• So How to move this to Mercedes-Benz MLK-Class ?

This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. From Mercedes-Benz MLKX-Class to Mercedes-Benz MLK-Class. –Hajor 19:50, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

• Shouldn't this article be called Mercedes-Benz X-Class because DaimlerChrysler said that hey're preparing to use "X-Class", and you people should always listen to the company that makes the automobile, rather than some newspaper or magazine or site saying that it should be called MLK-Class. Anyone agree? CrnaGora (Talk | Contribs | E-mail) 02:09, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Mercedes has registered the GLK name in July 2005, and the name GLK 63 in March 2006Hektor 21:17, 9 May 2006 (UTC).

this is a Spam! according to the last auto motor, the car still calld mercedes-benz MLK

• Automotive News has announced that Mercedes-Benz has officially confirmed that the name will be GLK. Hektor 10:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

2010?

"It is set for release in the United States at early 2010." I believe this line is incorrect. It is set for release in the U.S. in early 2009, not 2010. Besides, the info column says: Production 2008- . 67.171.172.44 (talk) 01:56, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Ad Copy

The section of saftey reads like it was taken right off of a Mercedes Benz brochure. It needs a rewrite. Andacar (talk) 04:43, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/66DUksvJD?url=http://www.4x4news.de/2008/01/03/erste-bilder-vom-neuen-kleinen-mercedes-suv-vision-glk-freeside/ to http://www.4x4news.de/2008/01/03/erste-bilder-vom-neuen-kleinen-mercedes-suv-vision-glk-freeside/
• Added archive https://archive.is/20130122135809/http://www.emercedesbenz.com/Jul08/15_001258_The_Mercedes_Benz_GLK_Class_Design.html to http://www.emercedesbenz.com/Jul08/15_001258_The_Mercedes_Benz_GLK_Class_Design.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121023032654/http://dreamcargarage.com/dreamcargarage/501 to http://dreamcargarage.com/dreamcargarage/501
• Added archive https://archive.is/20170222134726/http://www.emercedesbenz.com/Jul08/15_001261_The_Mercedes_Benz_GLK_Class_Active_And_Passive_Safety.html to http://www.emercedesbenz.com/Jul08/15_001261_The_Mercedes_Benz_GLK_Class_Active_And_Passive_Safety.html
• Added archive https://archive.is/20130119034713/http://chiefmarketer.com/entertainmentmarketing/mercedes_benz_sex_city_0507 to http://chiefmarketer.com/entertainmentmarketing/mercedes_benz_sex_city_0507

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 26 January 2018 (UTC)