Talk:Merchiston
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Merchiston article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Merchiston. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100220123817/http://www.merchistoncc.org.uk/pages/home.asp to http://www.merchistoncc.org.uk/pages/home.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:20, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Reopening of South Sub
editI have added a "citation needed" flag to the statement that the South Suburban is "mooted for reopening". In fact, the line never closed; it is heavily used today for goods traffic and empty stock working. As far as reopening for passenger traffic is concerned, this might or might be "mooted", but I am not aware of any serious plans on the table. If I am wrong about this, I hope someone will provide some details plus a citation. Mike Marchmont (talk) 18:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Following my above comment, I am still unable to find any information about the line currently being "mooted" for re-opening, and since no other editor has come forward with any further information, I have edited the article accordingly.Mike Marchmont (talk) 16:17, 20 August 2023 (UTC)