Talk:Meredith Jung-En Woo
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 18/3/2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Untitled
editi wish to re-nominate this page for deletion. it was nominated for deletion once before and i have read the debate on keep or delete. i found the reasons for keeping it to be weak and unconvincing. thus, i submit it be deleted. specifically, dr. meredith jung-en woo is not, by the academic standards of her field, a prolific writer or a central thinker. as an example, the koreanist bruce cumings (to whom she is married) has over 20 books. his contributions to the field of korean studies reshaped its issues and assumptions, particularly those surrounding the korean civil war. today, NO SCHOLAR wishing to research the korean civil war would be taken seriously unless they first addressed the arguements raised by bruce cumings. THAT is noteworthy among academics. dr. meredith jung-en woo is a very good scholar and has authored some very good works, but nothing about her record makes her exceptional in the field of korean studies. her research, while important in its own way, is not commonly thought of as being central to the field. a couple-three books are a very fine accomplishment, but among scholars, it is not exceptional. i know of a many other scholars whose records would warrent a page before her. next, her accomplishments such as appearing in the new york times are neither exceptionally noteworthy or overly numerous. i argue that for an academic to appear in wikipedia that person needs to be truely exceptional and to achievements that place him or her far above their peers and colleagues. wikipedia needs to have high standards in this area. in short, this seems more of a "vanity" page than a page dedicated to an exceptional scholar whose ideas have reworked or reshaped scholarship in their field. as such, i ask that you reopen the debate to delete the page. Hongkyongnae 22:58, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
The result of this AfD discussion was keep. (aeropagitica) (talk) 20:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Nomination for Deletion
editAny tenured political science professor at the University of Michigan has a credential equal or superior to Meredith Woo. I respect her work, but she is not a prominent scholar worthy of a page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.213.139.91 (talk) 03:58, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Statements on parentage
editSeems like a few contributors want to discuss Dr Woo's parentage here. I would remind everyone that this is a bio page of a living person, and as such all additions should come with citations. If the information about her parentage comes from reliable sources then cite it; otherwise it stays out. Tjarrett (talk) 13:50, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Meredith Jung-En Woo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060217134014/http://www.umich.edu/%7Eiinet/ksp/ to http://www.umich.edu/~iinet/ksp/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:56, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Conflict of interest
editUser:DawnGat3w00d says here [1] that they are are editing for their boss. Theroadislong (talk) 13:15, 9 March 2024 (UTC)