Talk:Mergers and acquisitions/Archives/2018

Latest comment: 6 years ago by 109.147.154.142 in topic Proposed edit


Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Mergers and acquisitions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:30, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed edit

Replace: "while when the deal is unfriendly (that is, when the target company does not want to be purchased)"

With: "while when the deal is unfriendly (that is, when the management of the target company opposes the deal)"

Motivation for this edit is that the "will of a company" is fuzzy concept. Does it refer to the will of the board or broader owner community or the management or other employees or what. If owners oppose the deal then they just do not sell their stake -> the text must refer specifically to the will of the target company management -> lets say it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.100.27.29 (talk) 09:54, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Seems right. Made the change proposed together with that a merger of equals is a definition of a merger and not an acquisition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.104.102.35 (talk) 15:56, 7 December 2015 (UTC)


This article is poorly constructed in general and I wish I had the time to go through it, but the most serious error is this one: the definition of an acquisition is certainly not that the deal is 'unfriendly' or that the target company's management are opposed, and in fact this is rarely the case. Moreover, though this point is less crucial, not all mergers are 'mergers of equals' and this is an informal description that may be *subjectively* applied to a merger, not a definition. Rather, both terms refer to the corporate structure of the entities post-deal. Incorrectly categorising all acquisitions as unfriendly ignores the many, many advantages companies can gain and ignores the fact that the management of many companies in excellent financial health actively seek them out by engaging with advisers. 109.147.154.142 (talk) 13:14, 17 October 2018 (UTC)