Talk:Merton Rule

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Plagiarism?

edit
  • You nicked all this from [[1]] i dont care, but some annoying wiki addict type will notice one day...

Its also not exactly POV free either? Still very informative. But it is plagurism (sp).

Bjrobinson 22:56, 27 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Amendment Proposal

edit
  • Is it worth amending the last sentence "though the ability of Councils to require additional energy efficiency measures in new buildings was removed."? The amendment to the Planning and Energy Act that revokes this power has not commenced, has no commencement date and was originally intended to commence with the introduction of Zero Carbon Homes in 2016, which will now not commence either. As a result, LPAs can still set standard for energy efficiency in new homes above building regs, though this might be capped at the equivalent of CSH4 depending on how much weight you give to Written Ministerial Statements. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/planning-update-march-2015

Sorry for the anonymous update - I'm not a Wikipedian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.195.140.17 (talk) 10:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hatnote added

edit
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Merton Rule. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply