Talk:Mes Aynak

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Mes Aynak monastery

edit

Mes Aynak is the name of an ancient Buddhist monastery in Afghanistan from the 2nd century BC covering 4500 square metre which is under threat from mining currently (see article). This should be mentioned in the article. --Diggindeeper (talk) 12:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Well, it's not from BC but from 2.-7. cent. AD. BTW, does anybody have the correct coordinates for Mes Aynak??

--Volker-th (talk) 21:03, 15 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Since July 29, 2011 all information about the ancient Buddhist monasteries in Mes Aynak has completely been deleted from this article. I suggest to reinsert some of this information. In its current state the article gives the misleading impression that Mes Aynak is significant primarily due to a copper mine and a defunct Qaeda training camp. The article should point out as well that Mes Aynak is a significant cultural heritage site. --Diggindeeper (talk) 13:59, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protection

edit

Due to persistent copyright violations I have semi-protected this article for three months. Dougweller (talk) 07:43, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Excavation

edit

This article describes things quite differently from the angry 2nd paragraph of the Archaeological excavation section, which got left in the article with only a citation needed tag.Narayanese (talk) 08:11, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Magnitude of Resource

edit

Aynak is in no way the world's second largest copper deposit. It is large, but 6 million tons of copper is surpassed by numerous other deposits worldwide. It is certainly the largest known copper deposit in Afghanistan.

Sludgeo (talk) 15:42, 6 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Buddhist Ruins

edit

Something i odd i found while reading through this article;

"The Buddhist ruins were scheduled to be destroyed at the end of July 2012, but for several reasons, including political instability, this has been delayed."

Is it me, or does this sound a bit POV'ish? Why would the ruins be destroyed? Aren't they an integral part of Afghan history? Seems like someone wrote this for the fun of it without sources. If no one objects, i will delete this line. Akmal94 (talk) 03:17, 23 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Usually most lead paragraphs in articles do not have sources they are a summary of sourced information within the article.
Also, did you read this part, including all the references?? --Kansas Bear (talk) 06:06, 23 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Spelling of name

edit

I've moved it back to the spelling used in the sources, or at least most of them as I haven't checked them all. I was searching for the meaning of the name and it quickly became obvious that Mes Aynak was the best way to search and greatly outnumbered other spellings in Google Books and Scholar. Doug Weller talk 16:40, 5 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mes Aynak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:41, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mes Aynak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:40, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply