Enigmatic???

edit

How can the general encyclopedic definition of an animal characterise it under the vague definition of "enigmatic"??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.83.95.88 (talk) 14:31, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Monoblastozoa

edit

What are the Monoblastozoa?--Crustaceanguy 00:49, 11 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Monoblastozoans appear to be simple animals with only a single layer of cells. But because they are based only on a single description, many workers doubt they are a real group. See the reference added to the article.
Cephal-odd 03:53, 11 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Remove life cycle?

edit

If Orthonectida and Rhombozoan are not closely related, how about removing the discussion of life cycles to the articles about those constituent phyla? Most of the details are specific to one group or the other anyway. Cephal-odd 04:01, 11 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Monophyletic?

edit

Why does the article say they used to be classed as a phylum (a ranked clade) but were recently discovered to be monophyletic, and are no longer treated as a clade? This is self-contradictory. Please clarify whether "Mesozoa" are polyphyletic or paraphyletic, as related to Rouphozoa. 2601:441:467F:9E00:D4E:A480:AA82:C438 (talk) 02:12, 7 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Mesozoan is not the singular of Mesozoa

edit

Mesozoan is not the singular of Mesozoa. I will remove it. --kupirijo (talk) 17:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply