Talk:Messerschmitt P.1079
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Messerschmitt P.1079 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ramjets vs pulsejets?
editIt says that since pulsejets needed to be launched before the engines would work it defeated the purpose of low cost and simplicity, so they went to a ramjet: that makes no sense, because a ramjet has to have high speed airflow around it to work, just like a pulsejet. There is no benefit there. AnnaGoFast (talk) 00:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Sources
editThis article appears to be citing the website of a company selling resin kits of 'concept aircraft' as some sort of source. I very much doubt that the website meets WP:RS. 86.143.231.214 (talk) 09:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Looking at this further, I doubt that most of the other sources cited would meet WP:RS either. Accordingly, I have to ask whether this article meets Wikipedia notability criteria at all. 86.143.231.214 (talk) 09:05, 16 December 2019 (UTC)