Talk:Meta-emotion
Meta-emotion was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 30, 2012). There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Prehistory
editThe explanation of one of the cells in the Becker section is missing. DCDuring 15:32, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Mark this article as "need expansion?"
editI dont know all the codes for an article, but I think this article needs the note that some newly created or poor written articles has. Not sure what that note says, but it something with "Expansion needed, please help". Please re-write this discission section too for me :p, it's poorly written. Sorry, im not that good with editing wiki articles, but I will learn how to do so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.250.74.141 (talk) 19:10, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Updates to article
editI hope that the additions I have made to this article show a marked improvement from what previously existed. I have added much more information and seventeen references to better explain the concept of meta-emotion, particularly parental meta-emotion philosophy. I will continue to work on improving this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acal26 (talk • contribs) 22:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Sources
editJust a side note, it may be beneficial to try and add some more sources in your article, especially in the introduction section. Vmansoor (talk) 14:13, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Other uses of the concept.
editThis article is mistitled: the contents are limited to parenting meta-emotions. The notion is much broader than that--e.g. schadenfreude has been widely cited as a metaemotion. Please either change the title or broaden the discussion. Burressd (talk) 21:28, 27 May 2017 (UTC)