 | The contents of the Metagaming page were merged into Metagame on 15 December 2006 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
The metagame has little to do with role-playing games in general, and nothing to do with the situation provided by Percy Snoodle. Also, we don't have to suppose that there is a four-move win in chess because there is a four-move win in chess. Reisen 06:44, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
This part "Player A is trying to figure out the hidden move that Player B has made. A thinks that it may be Move X, which Move Y can counter. However, Player B may have thought of that and not played Move X. Then A realizes that maybe B wanted A to think that and has made Move X. It is an infinite regress, and A cannot predict the move without more information." is not metagaming but only logic.