Talk:Methodology/Archives/2024/March
Latest comment: 7 months ago by 2806:106E:1C:C00B:4A2:FD01:B768:B83F in topic Original research
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Methodology. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Original research
This article is riddled with original research. In particular, the entire "Examples" section ought be deleted. 24.126.199.129 04:58, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
I disagree - the examples given are not original. They are uncited and vague, which is different. Links need to be given to either the sources or if there are none, to other articles/websites which explain positivism and constructionism in more detail. But it is relevant stuff and shouldn't be deleted. Perhaps it should instead be complemented with an example of a justification of research design, or something like that?
- (please sign your comments). I agree with whoever wrote the paragraph directly above. The examples help the reader understand what a methodology is. It sure helped me. The Transhumanist 07:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC)