Talk:Metro Purple Line (Minnesota)

Learn more about this page

Trains: Rapid transit Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rush Line Corridor changes

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I'm inexperienced when it comes to editing wiki, but I have updates I have made to this page in the past to add more current info. I have new info to add, but really it could end up changing the categories. Currently the wiki has it categorized as a Rail project. While that was one of the options, the official board has decided to instead use Bus Rapid Transit and cover a much smaller area http://rushline.org. Technically speaking, the Rush Line Transportation Corridor still exists in its full extent, but the actual service type, and scope of the service area is reduced to only a portion of the corridor. I'd like some guidance as to how to proceed to edit, as it doesn't really fit Rail category anymore. I've tried to identify other templates to use (e.g. from looking at other BRT pages) and I could do that, but I'm not sure if that is the proper route (no pun intended) that I should take. Other alternatives could be abandoning this page as it is rail categorized, and create a new one for the BRT version?

Does someone who has more experience with wiki editing have suggestions?

Lauren.fentiman (talk) 22:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

I've updated the article to mention BRT was the chosen alternative. The article could use more information from the 2017 LPA study and the work that has been done since then. Eóin (talk) 00:24, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic