Talk:Metroid: Zero Mission/GA1
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Gary King in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Review by Drilnoth (talk · contribs)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- The two "software sales. NPD" refs could use some clarification, but that's about the only real problem I see, and it won't make or break the nomination.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Great work! -Drilnoth (talk) 03:55, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Alright, I will try to clear those two references up and wikilink them as well. Gary King (talk) 04:25, 13 February 2009 (UTC)