Talk:Metropolitan Borough of Stoke Newington

Latest comment: 16 years ago by BetacommandBot in topic Fair use rationale for Image:Arms-stoke-newington.jpg

Pix

edit

Haven't got an ego thing going moving and resizing these. Just seems to be so little text info that sticking those two below the infobox seemed to make the whole thing pretty unbalanced in terms of layout.

I tend to think that areas should have a key (290px or so) pic on the right above the infobox (which is really a geek thing), but I do understand that that is not standard. Just wonder if it's that important to try and get the infobox above the 'fold' is all. It's mostly just pack drill.

rv if you like, I won't mind, just trying out a different layout. Another solution might be to punt out more text, but this is kind of low on the priority list for that...

Tarquin Binary 01:45, 27 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Have made the Hackney reference a bit clearly. Morwen is correct in that it wasn't too clear. Tarquin Binary 18:41, 25 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Arms-stoke-newington.jpg

edit
 

Image:Arms-stoke-newington.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply