Talk:Metropolitan regions of Norway

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified


I arrived to this page starting from italian Wiki (I'm italian, in fact, so please forgive any error...), and I've found that there's a severe discrepancy between this page and the correspondant one in norwegian. Although I don't speak a word in that language, it appears to be a huge difference in the information: e.g., the english page talks about 6 + 10 "areas", while the norwegian one refer to 14 "areas", there is a few (or none) correspondance among the names in the various tables, etc.

Is it possible to try to amend this?

94.127.83.40 (talk) 15:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)Alberto Magrassi - almagras@libero.itReply

I agree that work needs to be carried out to bring the article into line with the (more accurate) information at no:Byregioner. The main causes of the discrepancies are:
  • The English-language article has separate entries for a "Drammen Region" and a "Moss Region" made up of a total of 12 kommuner (municipalities). In reality these form part of the Stor-Oslo (Greater Oslo) Region. This accounts for the listing of 6+10 regions in the en: article when there are, in fact, only 14 (as indicated in the no: article).
  • The number of kommuner in each region is incorrect in the en: version as far as the Ålesund, Bodø, Haugesund, and Trondheim Regions are concerned: this has a knock-on effect on population totals and size-ranking.
The population figures in the en: article could do with being updated, once corrections responding to the aforementioned points have been made.
Also relevant, I think, is that the en: article makes a distinction between the six largest regions and the others which is not present in the no: article. The 2003 Norwegian government study cited does make this distinction for the purposes of its report, but that does not AFAIK mean that there is at present any administrative/legal distinction between the "top six" and the others.
I can see (anticipating the "well, if you know what's wrong, then go ahead and fix it" reaction) that I've given myself plenty of work to do! -- Picapica (talk) 21:46, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Metropolitan regions of Norway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:10, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply