Talk:Mexican Grand Prix

Latest comment: 6 months ago by MicrobiologyMarcus in topic Requested move 26 March 2024

Herman Tilke graphic

edit

Hello, would it be possible for the Herman Tilke graphic to be rotated so that the orientation is the same as the other two beneath it? As it is, it is very difficult to compare how the track has evolved and changed through the years. I think that it also needs to be moved to the bottom as that would show the chronological changes better. I would do this myself, but I have no idea when it comes to graphics. Thanks. Kiltpin (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mexican Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mexican Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:30, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Official names

edit

The "Official names" section is laughable. The official name was the same all along until 2019. The minor variations on the front covers of the programs are merely typographical, or branding at best. Such covers should not be misconstrued as evidence of an official name change. -- P 1 9 9   17:00, 6 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Posters shouldn't be used as evidence of an official name, period. SSSB (talk) 20:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Yes. That's why it'll be better to remove this silly section. -- P 1 9 9   22:53, 6 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Is this page special? Every single Formula One Grand Prix article has this section. Why did you remove it at all only for this one? An user in the past had to go to great lengths so as to provide all those sources (from the same origin) that report how the Grand Prix was called for some editions, despite having small differences. This job was done for every single Formula One Grand Prix article and I thought it was appreciated. It is the first time a circumstance by removing it at all occurs, as well as I'm experiecing it. But I repeat, why only for this one? Just have a look at each Grand Prix page, what I mean. It's full. I don't understand why you make some decision out of the blue from time to time actually. There is always the Wiki Project Formula One page to talk specifically, rather than removing an entire section.Island92 (talk) 00:44, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Why this page? Because I noticed it here. Yes, it is always unfortunate if someone has put in a lot of work, but you have to admit, this section is really flawed. I do agree with you that since it is on all GP articles, it is better if this is centrally discussed on the projectpage. -- P 1 9 9   14:41, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Island92: you might want to take a look at WP:EFFORT. SSSB (talk) 18:37, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 26 March 2024

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved as the consensus was this is too soon for a page rename; not enough coverage in secondary sources using the new name. (non-admin closure) microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 18:30, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply


Mexican Grand PrixMexico City Grand Prix – official name (Heroeswithmetaphors) talk 22:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). 2pou (talk) 17:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The motor race has only been called the Mexico City Grand Prix since 2021 - therefore it has been known officially as the Mexican Grand Prix for the great majority of its history.Nigel Ish (talk) 22:41, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.