WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

edit

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 22:56, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

its a company operating in Israeli occupied territory

edit

Therefor the category is correct. Its not pov when its the entire worldview that its occupied. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 22:14, 31 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

This category is uncontroversial in the sense that no one is seriously arguing that is not operating in Israeli-occupied territory, such information is clear from the article. Please discuss before to removing it. Unomi (talk) 01:14, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
I re added some info in the controversy section, the sit in at the university that led to a ban is important, removed Israel geo since this geographic location is not in Israel, also created a sub category specially for Israeli companies operating in the occupied territories so we can put all those together for easy navigation. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 19:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
If you are going to readd info, you should justify it. I had removed it because it was a simple line not adding anything substantial to the article about a NN event from a NN group. Creating a subcat while the cat is at cfd is not good faith and might be considered sneaky. --Shuki (talk) 23:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
That a student group at a university got the water banned is notable and substantial, and should be mentioned in the article. "Category:Israeli companies operating in the occupied territories" is not up for cfd, you have removed it without explaining why it should be removed. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 23:29, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
I explained why I removed it quite clearly. Should I add POV and POINT? A student group without a separate WP article at a minor university is NN (not notable). --Shuki (talk) 00:08, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Its a separate category not up for cfd, if the other cat at cfd gets deleted, it has nothing to do with this one, and still is no reason for you to remove it, and how is it pov? I disagree, I believe it is very notable that the University College London Union banned the water, since this company is operating in occupied lands, you removed it without consensus.--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 19:03, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

It's not a separate cat at all and in fact, directly related to skirt the cfd. --Shuki (talk) 22:49, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
No its not, its a separate cat, it can work as a sub cat or cat on its own. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 23:13, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Dude, give us a break. Most of us have high school diplomas here. --Shuki (talk) 10:03, 16 April 2010 (UTC)Reply