Talk:Premier Health Miami Valley Hospital South/GA1
(Redirected from Talk:Miami Valley Hospital South/GA1)
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Ed! in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs) 19:28, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- I propose to take on this review and will be looking in detail at the article shortly. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:28, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
First reading
edit- In the infobox, it would be better to have a properly formatted reference for the hospital's website as in this article
- Fixed. —Ed!(talk) 12:25, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- "... a full service hospital with a physician office building ..." - I'm from the UK and am ignorant of US hospitals. What is a "physician office building"?
- Reworded. —Ed!(talk) 12:25, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- "... features a number of specialty care options including an oncology center, cardiology, sports medicine, and maternity care to cater to the suburban community surrounding the hospital." - If you say "oncology center" you need to use a similar structure for the other care options (department, facility, center or whatever).
- Fixed. —Ed!(talk) 12:25, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- The first sentence in the History section is too long and needs to be split up.
- Fixed. —Ed!(talk) 12:25, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- The first sentence in the second paragraph of the History section is also too long.
- Fixed. —Ed!(talk) 12:25, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- "... consumer demand for care in a single facility and without transferring to other hospitals." - Maybe "... without the need to transfer to other hospitals."
- Fixed. —Ed!(talk) 12:25, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- The sentence starting "In late 2010, to add..." does not have a verb.
- Fixed. —Ed!(talk) 12:25, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- "A $20,000,000 comprehensive cancer care center was also added along with a physician office building was added as well." and this sentence has too many!
- Fixed. —Ed!(talk) 12:25, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- "It saw admittance to its emergency room ..." - To what does "It" refer here?
- Fixed. —Ed!(talk) 12:25, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- The word "facility" is overused in the last paragraph of the History section.
- Fixed. —Ed!(talk) 12:25, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- I'll stop there for now and will look at the rest of the article tomorrow. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:01, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- The first paragraph of the Services section uses the word "services" too often, three times in the first sentence for example. Can you replace some of them?
- Fixed. —Ed!(talk) 12:25, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- It is also rather jargon-laden. What does "a full-service food facility" mean?
- Reworked. —Ed!(talk) 12:25, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- "When it opened, Miami Valley Hospital specialty services for ovarian cancer and uterine cancer were moved to Miami Valley Hospital South." - this is somewhat ambiguous,and "it" could be taken to refer to Miami Valley Hospital rather than the new hospital. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:55, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- Fixed. I think that's everything. Thanks for your review! —Ed!(talk) 12:25, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- That reads better! It would be nice to have an image of the hospital. Can you find anything? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:54, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- Nothing with copyright requirements that could get it to upload, but the next time I'm near the hospital I plan to snap a photo. —Ed!(talk) 13:08, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- Would you prefer me to bring this review to a conclusion in this WikiCup round or the next? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:34, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- This one is fine. Appreciate you asking, though. —Ed!(talk) 14:39, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- Would you prefer me to bring this review to a conclusion in this WikiCup round or the next? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:34, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- Nothing with copyright requirements that could get it to upload, but the next time I'm near the hospital I plan to snap a photo. —Ed!(talk) 13:08, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- That reads better! It would be nice to have an image of the hospital. Can you find anything? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:54, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- Fixed. I think that's everything. Thanks for your review! —Ed!(talk) 12:25, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
GA Criteria
edit- 1a The article is well written.
- 1b The article conforms with the MOS guidelines for layout, lead, section headings etc.
- 2a&b The article is well referenced and has inline citations for all contentious statements.
- 2c There is no original research as far as I can see.
- 3a&b The coverage is broad enough and the article does not include irrelevant material.
- 4 The article is neutral.
- 5 The article has been much expanded in the last week by the nominator and nobody else has edited it recently.
- 6 & 7 There are no images at the moment. The nominator hopes to add one soon but article is acceptable without any.
- Overall assessment - Pass.