Talk:Michael A. Monsoor/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Ed! in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch


GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)
  1. It is reasonably well written:
    Not Yet
    1. Please explain the significance of the Valor Device on his Bronze Star somewhere in the article, to differentiate it from a peacetime Bronze Star.
Done. I added it as a footnote. --Kumioko (talk) 21:57, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable:
    1. "He entered Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL training but had to drop out because of an injury" - needs a ref.
Done. I couldn't find were it came from so I removed it for now. --Kumioko (talk) 21:57, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
    1. "He later reentered and graduated from Class 250 on September 2, 2004 as one of the top performers in his class." - needs a ref.
Done. --Kumioko (talk) 21:57, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
  1. It is broad in its coverage:
    Pass No problems there.
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy:
    Pass No problems there.
  3. It is stable:
    Pass No problems there.
  4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
    Pass No problems there.
  5. Overall:
    On Hold to address issues. —Ed!(talk) 03:35, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
    All right, the article now meets the GA criteria according to my interpretation of them. Well done. —Ed!(talk) 23:17, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply