Talk:Michael A. Monsoor/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)

1. It is reasonably well written:

   Not Yet

   1. Please explain the significance of the Valor Device on his Bronze Star somewhere in the article, to differentiate it from a peacetime Bronze Star.

Done. I added it as a footnote. --Kumioko (talk) 21:57, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable:
   1. "He entered Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL training but had to drop out because of an injury" - needs a ref.

Done. I couldn't find were it came from so I removed it for now. --Kumioko (talk) 21:57, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

1. 1. "He later reentered and graduated from Class 250 on September 2, 2004 as one of the top performers in his class." - needs a ref.

Done. --Kumioko (talk) 21:57, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

1. It is broad in its coverage:

   Pass No problems there.

2. It follows the neutral point of view policy:

   Pass No problems there.

3. It is stable:

   Pass No problems there.

4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:

   Pass No problems there.

5. Overall:

   On Hold to address issues. —Ed!^(talk) 03:35, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

   All right, the article now meets the GA criteria according to my interpretation of them. Well done. —Ed!^(talk) 23:17, 16 August 2009 (UTC)