Talk:Michael Czugaj

Pronunciation

How do you say this suckers name?--Steven X 02:15, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Shoo-guy. 58.178.95.43 05:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Additional Stuff.

Should we add something about how he's lucky he didn't appeal further, and therefore escaped a possible death penalty? 58.178.95.43 05:58, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

No. See No original research. -- Longhair 06:06, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Michael Czugaj/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 00:36, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

I'll review this article shortly. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 00:36, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

I see many issues throughout the article. Here are some:

• The first sentence reads like something out of a sensationalist newspaper with how the words are placed. Reword in a way most other articles have it.
• "Czugaj was an apprentice glazier, keen surfer, one of eight children." Reword to make the sentence cleaner.
• "Subsequent to the criminal proceedings in Bali, in 2008 Czugaj's older brother, Richard, pleaded guilty to assault and was sentenced to 18 months jail.[6]" I'm not convinced this is needed in the article, given it's not about Michael directly. Either way, the paragraph has some tone problems that are evident in the rest of the article, which causes problems.
• "A subsequent appeal for a more lenient sentence was upheld on 26 April 2006." should be cited.
• There are parts where the articles talks a lot more about the Bali Nine itself than the person. It's not too bad, but be careful about not going into too much of a tangent.
• The citation needed has to be addressed.
• There's not much on his early life. There's a bit, but it reads a bit cryptically, and ideally more could be found.
• There are a few deadlinks in the article to fix: see here.
• Many of the issues brought up in the two reviewed before this seem to apply here as well.

While this isn't an exhaustive list of issues, it's enough to tell me that the article should be failed outright, mainly due to the tone and tangent issues, though this article doesn't seem as bad as a couple others I read. Once everything I noted is addressed, it would be best to put the article up for peer review first. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 00:50, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Czugaj. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927005717/http://www.usp.com.au/fpss/case-bali9-michael_czugaj.html to http://www.usp.com.au/fpss/case-bali9-michael_czugaj.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:54, 27 January 2018 (UTC)