Talk:Michael Fulford
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 January 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editCavila -- I can not view the whole of the "Romanitas: essays on Roman archaeology in honour of Sheppard Frere, ed. R.J.A. Wilson. Oxford: Oxbow, 2006" online, but a search of the book turns up none of the claims you say it has. I'm frankly skeptical that p. xxi of the introduction would have so much detail on one of the essay contributors. I guess i'll have to get to hard library tuesday to double check.
- Yeah, hunt down a hard copy if you like. It may have been all in my head : ) Cavila (talk) 14:20, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
As for all the "probably best known" language, that's just not sourceable to anything. Just say what he does/did.Bali ultimate (talk) 14:11, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- You're talking about the lead or the same information a couple of lines down? You want the lead sourced as well? Also, I didn't thumb up "probably". Cavila (talk) 14:20, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oh and why "articles"? That's not how you refer to these monograph series. Cavila (talk) 14:23, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Michael Fulford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606070531/http://www.britac.ac.uk/fellowship/directory/archive.asp?fellowsID=1013 to http://www.britac.ac.uk/fellowship/directory/archive.asp?fellowsID=1013
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140531124251/http://www.britac.ac.uk/about/officers.cfm to http://www.britac.ac.uk/about/officers.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:11, 20 January 2018 (UTC)