Talk:Michael Husbands

Protect?

There's been quite a lot of vandalism on here lately. If it continues, I think we should protect the page.--Airplaneman (talk) 19:24, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

This is michael husbands and the info on here about me is not correct and I would like it changed or deleted please —Preceding unsigned comment added by Golden0098 (talk • contribs)

I see you've had a reply on your talk page from someone who knows what they're talking about, so I'll leave it to them. But if there's anything specific in the article that's wrong, then you could mention that here if you'd prefer. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 20:49, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

It appears that Husbands was the last editor of the article. Do you disagree with your own edits? What is incorrect? Toddst1 (talk) 20:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

When an article is protected to stamp out an edit-war, that does not grant any specific recognition or approval to the state of the article that was frozen. One thing I notice is that some of the removed content had cited references. Can you (Golden0098) explain what's going on there? Wikipedia lives on verifiable material from reliable sources, so if it's published somewhere, need something at least as strongly citable to contradict or better explain it. DMacks (talk) 20:55, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

I think we should delete that line about "had prophesied that Husbands' chance at Oxford could be his last" -- that's straight opinion, and just because someone says "this could be his last chance" doesn't mean it _is_... --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:26, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Well yes, but the article clearly states that that is what the manager said and wasn't something handed down by the gods of football. Maybe we could put in the Sky Sports references and say "He was released by Port Vale in July 2007<ref=BBC> after deciding to look for first team football elsewhere.<ref=SkySports>" Everything else is clearly correct, unless the BBC have some kind of vendetta against Husbands and decide to write lies about him.--EchetusXe (talk) 13:40, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

The last edit by Golden0098 left a sentence broken. It needs fixing, although I'm unsure of what should be there if anything. The BBC news pages agree with the text in the article[3][4], but maybe Sky Sports[5][6] doesn't. snigbrook (talk) 23:00, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Michael Husbands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111005051321/http://www.camsfc.ac.uk/cmsfc-news.asp?newsid=122 to http://www.camsfc.ac.uk/cmsfc-news.asp?newsid=122
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100119180226/http://www.royalmarinesfootball.co.uk/pageID_7545959.html to http://www.royalmarinesfootball.co.uk/pageID_7545959.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:57, 16 January 2018 (UTC)