Talk:Michael Imison
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Michael Imison should be kept on the Wikipedia site due to the recent surge of interest into the whole Doctor Who phenomenon. Search engine ' Google ' has reported a huge increase in early Dr Who searches. Michael Imison is a major part of the programmes history and should be allowed to remain on Wikipedia for that reason alone.
He is also married to Tamsyn Imison DBE , and the 'Imison Dynasty ' is still very much a part of Islington life even to this day.
I agree, as a Doctor Who fanatic, I will always remember the early episodes .Who could forget William Hartnell,Peter Purves and Jackie Lane. They are legends of Doctor Who history and Michael Imison helped bring them all to life. This is what I love about Wikipedia, it caters to us Sci Fi bores.
I would advise anyone intersted in the classic early year's of Doctor Who to look at this Wikipedia entry. It is a tragedy so many of these early episodes were lost. It is probably why the work of director's such as Michael Imison and Bill Sellars often get's overlooked. There is so much interest at the moment with the whole Doctor phenomena that it would not surprize me if the BBC commissioned a remake of these early classics.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Michael Imison. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030921084420/http://www.humanism.org.uk/site/cms/contentviewarticle.asp?article=1160 to http://www.humanism.org.uk/site/cms/contentviewarticle.asp?article=1160
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080422013204/http://www.towertheatre.org.uk/plays/list1963.htm to http://www.towertheatre.org.uk/plays/list1963.htm
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.clubdesmonstres.com/monoids.jpg - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030921084420/http://www.humanism.org.uk/site/cms/contentviewarticle.asp?article=1160 to http://www.humanism.org.uk/site/cms/contentviewarticle.asp?article=1160
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:56, 18 January 2018 (UTC)