Semi-protected edit request on 7 October 2023

edit

Citation 127 on Mike Lindell page is incorrect and not up to date 2600:1700:7E90:1B50:2130:CE4F:74F0:473 (talk) 00:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Tollens (talk) 01:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

infobox picture

edit

@HistorianL: I noticed you replaced the image in Lindell's infobox to one you have taken. While it is great that you've gone ahead and taken a photo of him yourself, we already have higher quality and recent photoportraits of Lindell so please do not replace the picture.

Howard🌽33 19:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think it’s obvious which image im voting for. I vote for Option A HistorianL (talk) 20:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
This isn't a democracy, and please do not let your personal attachment to the photo dictate which photo you will support. It should be obvious that the photo on the left is of a lesser technical quality, considering the odd posture, low resolution, and unprofessional composition. ―Howard🌽33 20:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
The image could be used elsewhere in the article, perhaps to showcase his attendance at the Turning Point Convention with some extra information about his connection to the convention. But, according to MOS:IMAGELEAD, the lead image should be "the type of image used for similar purposes in high-quality reference works." This means that we should avoid the usage of casual selfies if we have photographs by professional photographers available.
Also, please do not remove people's comments on the talk page without good reason, see WP:TPO. ―Howard🌽33 20:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
 

I've restored the status quo image at while people reach consensus here. I have no opinion myself, just noting that there is a third image in the running here. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 20:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm honestly fine with the status quo image remaining. It's of high technical quality, although the posture of Lindell is a bit awkward with his neck twisting like that. ―Howard🌽33 20:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

False news networks as verified sources.

edit

you must stop using 2600:100B:B020:AC44:DCBD:F69E:55F9:C75D (talk) 16:41, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 24 August 2024

edit

Too REMOVE THE CONSPIRACY TITLE. THIS IS DEFERMATION OF HIS NAME. PATRIOT IS CORRECT WORD! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.250.179.39 (talk) 06:28, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: The term is well-sourced in the article. Tollens (talk) 06:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply