This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 6 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
The sources do not show that the subject meets WP:NACADEMICS. I do not see the awards as meeting #2 and he does not meet #5. The sources present are not enough to support him meeting the other criteria or GNG I believe. Dom from Paris (talk) 22:06, 31 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
The criteria #2 says "The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level." Is the award a highly prestigious one? Dom from Paris (talk) 22:47, 31 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
I would have thought that being a finalist for a Pulitzer sure gets pretty close to notability -- thinking of it as a significant honor, even though he didn't win the prize.–CaroleHenson (talk) 02:42, 1 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Winning would most certainly count but being a finalist is debatable. I think we can say that in this case when we talk about honours it is not subjective but in the sense of an award or decoration. I think it would be better to search for sources to show he passes GNG as I am sure there must be. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:56, 1 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Just to close this out for historical purposes, the tag has been removed by Editorofthewiki (EDDY), which I am fine with. I get that it's a borderline circumstance, but I think he nudges over the line with the award and Pulitzer nom.–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:30, 1 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
