| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Not a CV
editThis version of the article had the character of a curriculum vitae, and was in fact largely sourced from the subject's résumé. It was written by Antheat17, a single-purpose account, so I expect that there was a conflict of interest.
I've also removed the discussion of the Hannafin-Peck model. It was a stock-standard diagram saying to assess needs, design the course and implement; evaluating and revising along the way. That's not worth a section.
I guess Prof. Hannafin meets WP:PROF, but the article is marginal at best, even after cleanup, and needs more third-party sources. --Slashme (talk) 10:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)