Talk:Michael Kimball

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Untitled

edit

I flagged this article for POV Check because much of it seems promotional rather than informational. I am not contesting the notability of the subject, but I think the article requires editing to comply with biography guidelines. -- archym (talk) 20:06, 17 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've cleaned it up to conform to Wikipedia standards (took 45 minutes) and toned down the number of blurbs to include only those that have something of substance to contribute, and not just fawning praise. The article does need serious criticism and not just blurbs from journalists. Fothergill Volkensniff IV (talk) 13:49, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Michael Kimball. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:07, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply