Talk:Michael Marsh (sprinter)

Latest comment: 15 years ago by 94.220.254.142 in topic 19.65

19.65

edit

The estimate that his 19.73 was worth 19.65 is highly dubious, and would, at a minimum, require better sourcing.

I note that claims about "athlete x easing up and losing [large amount of time]" are almost constantly over-optimistic. A several hundredths of a second is usually a better estimate. 94.220.254.142 (talk) 16:26, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply