Talk:Michael McMahon
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Michael McMahon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Steve Harrison
editHarrison's 06 performance is completely relevant. The Times and many other media outlets regularly mention this fact, when discussing this race. The 06 performance is his opponent's rationale for remaining in the race. This is not a McMahon campaign site (nor is this a Harrison site). Mentioning the performance is not electioneering. Its purely factual and adds context. It is not an advocacy statement any more than stating McMahon's endorsements. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.168.100.147 (talk) 15:29, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
While I don't doubt the claim about Harrison's vote total, I don't think it belongs in an article about his primary opponent. To keep it would appear to undermine McMahon's candidacy. Polutlas (talk) 06:16, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Harrison's performance in 2006 is relevant on HIS page, not McMahon's. It adds no context to the discussion of McMahon's performance in 2008, any more than the mention that the Jets got further into the playoffs last year is relevant on a write-up of last year's Super Bowl. If you're such a big fan of Harrison, feel free to update his page; no one else will mind.165.97.69.13 (talk) 22:58, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
pov wording
editThis is supposed to be a npov section. Saying things like historic plan are pov loaded. This article needs rewriting on several sentences to sound less like a politcal ad. 161.185.151.150 (talk) 17:24, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Michael McMahon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130415163929/http://www.opencongress.org/people/voting_history/412296_Michael_McMahon to http://www.opencongress.org/people/voting_history/412296_Michael_McMahon
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080612203402/http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2008/06/city-congressional-dems-unite.html to http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2008/06/city-congressional-dems-unite.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)