Talk:Michael Pitts (pastor)
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BLPN
editAnyone tempted to revert the recent edits by CorporateM and Ukexpat should first see the recent discussion at BLPN. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 18:17, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because...
Michael Pitts is a notable personality in the city of Toledo, nationally in the USA, and globally in many circles. He is the author of nine books, has Pastored for almost 30 years, and oversees a network of more than 100 churches. Considering this, his influence reaches to the tens of thousands of people. Several newspapers have written articles about him, and his church, and with dozens of page views each day, I cant understand how this page could be considered for deletion. As far as I can tell, several similar pages exist on wikipedia, stating achievements, product, and influence.
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because... I think an AfD is needed for this discussion --CorporateM (Talk) 19:48, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Case for speedy deletion
editThis article does not comport with BLP guidelines on several counts, to include: NPOV, NOR, and verifiability, and the content fails to adequately establish general notability of the article's subject. Dispassionateness and disinterest of tone and non-partisan use of reliable secondary sources are very questionable, and the article is overweighted with favorable promotional-like content without any balancing content referencing the substantial extant critical and controversial information regarding the subject published by reliable and credible secondary sources such as legitimate newspaper articles, law enforcement websites reporting arrests, and published civil court records. The nature and history of this page belies the validity of any potential eventualism claims as well. The article relies too heavily on self-published, non-independent, and questionable sources. The two contesting arguments are weak and not convincing, and have the sound and feel of being written by individuals closely associated with or strongly biased toward the subject. More could be said, but this should be sufficient to make a strong case for speedy deletion.Editorialideation999 (talk) 01:18, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Michael Pitts (pastor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140715021025/https://newstore.cornerstonetoledostore.com/Books/HealtheWorld.aspx to https://newstore.cornerstonetoledostore.com/Books/HealtheWorld.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:26, 28 January 2018 (UTC)