This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
At a first glance, it appears that a merge with Ursula Sladek might be in order, their notability seems sufficiently linked that a single article on the both of them might be more encyclopedic. But not having delved into every possible source, I'll leave that for future editors' consideration. --joe deckertalk to me19:49, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
I agree with that rationale and it's sourced enough. I was more asking the question of whether Michael was independently notable, and even if he was, whether most of their story was so intertwined that the biographies were better written together. I didn't immediately see a source for Michael's prize, and what news coverage I found in a quick search *only* had him included in the context of Ursula. But it sounds like you've looked at it and think two articles is a better editorial decision, and I'll accept that, I'm just passing through trying to deal with unsourced articles. Cheers, --joe deckertalk to me21:13, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
