Talk:Michael U. Gisriel
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Edit warring with Mdpoly5
editI am perfectly satisfied with the reversion of the article to its previous version. Neither Mdpoly5 nor MDLobby51 have ever edited anything on Wikipedia other than this article, and their edits have consistently sought to portray the subject as an attorney (which he manifestly no longer is), and to remove all reference to his disbarment. Coincidentally or not, the subject of the article is a Maryland lobbyist who was born in 1951.
I apologize for engaging in an edit war, which I have never done before, but I think it is important that the well-documented information about the subject's disbarment should be included in the article, and that the subject not be referred to as an attorney. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leevank (talk • contribs) 22:09, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
New edits by Bunnybug33
editNot surprisingly, a new editor who had never before edited a Wikipedia article shows up to delete all references to the subject's disbarment. This time, he also makes a couple of very minor edits to other articles within minutes of this one. At this point, this seems to be vandalism, and a deliberate attempt to prevent this article from referencing the well-documented fact of the subject's disbarment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leevank (talk • contribs) 00:26, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Page protection
editDue to the continued edit-warring I've fully protected the article for one month. Details of the protection can be found at WP:FPP. Discuss any requested changes here! —SMALLJIM 19:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC)