Talk:Michael Wigston
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Michael Wigston article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Michael Wigston. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151117033054/http://www.gulabin.com/armynavy/pdf/Ministry%20of%20Defence%20Senior%20Posts.pdf to http://www.gulabin.com/armynavy/pdf/Ministry%20of%20Defence%20Senior%20Posts.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:28, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:52, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Update to criticism of Wigston
editWigston's career has been marked by the dismal performance of the new MFTS Flying Training System, the poor condition of RAF family housing, and the needless scrapping of the Leading and Senior Aircraftsman/woman ranks. 167.98.253.66 (talk) 07:53, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- These sound like MoD failures, or they could be failures by the Government to fund these services properly. I cannot find any sources that say Wigston was personally at fault. Dormskirk (talk) 10:48, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Inappropriate section heading
editAn IP has introduced a section heading "Leaked Transcript Scandal". I would suggest that a more neutral heading might be "Criticism over diversity targets" or something similar. The media, in their quest for news, forget that in 2019, when Wigston was appointed, the big issue was discrimination and bullying in the armed forces. See here and plenty more. Dormskirk (talk) 16:43, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- Now amended. Dormskirk (talk) 09:01, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- With these edits I previously inserted a background sentence which explained the context i.e. lack of diversity in the RAF. That information has now been relegated to a clause in brackets later in the paragraph. The IP said in an edit summary that my background sentence contained "inaccurate coverage and whitewashing". The information came from several sources including a response to a FOI request. I propose restoring my earlier sentence unless the IP can satisfactorily explain why it is inaccurate. Dormskirk (talk) 11:34, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Now amended. Dormskirk (talk) 09:50, 9 April 2023 (UTC)