Talk:Michigan Corners, New York
This article was nominated for deletion on May 4, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Michigan Corners, New York. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927000941/http://www.placenames.com/us/p957068/ to http://www.placenames.com/us/p957068/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Unreliable source tag
editI've removed the unreliable source tag on the legend of how the town got its name. The source is sufficiently reliable as to the existence of the legend, which is the only element being claimed as fact. Other than that, the text merely recounts the legend, clearly identifying it as such. There is no claim that the source supports the content of the legend as fact. The source is theefore not appropriately tagged as unreliable. Poihths (talk) 13:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC)