Talk:MicroSIP
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Wefa in topic Lets remove the maintenance header
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 March 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the MicroSIP article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Lets remove the maintenance header
editfor nine years this article has head an ugly maintenance header. It complains of 2 things:
- too much reliance on primary sources. Well - that is normal with product articles, especially in the context of open source. The New York Times rarely writes articles about obscure open source projects Amf over the last 10 years - lack of notability. Well, despite his concerns the author was not willing to actually to do an RfD, so I presume he - like me - thought he is likely wrong with this.
The maintenance template was added at the day of the article's creation. I conclude the issues have been addressed since.
I propose to remove the template, and, barring serious objections, intend to do so. Wefa (talk) 17:05, 24 July 2020 (UTC)