Talk:Microclimate

Confusing Photo?

The photo in this article is confusing because it doesn't give context or scale. As is, it looks like a polished piece of eclogite. Can anyone figure out a better photo for this article?

An attempt at humor?

"Biddulph Grange is very rich with microclimates as a result of the large dips and variety of very large trees alongside a large amount of water."

This article focuses on microclimates within "cities and regions," not on the shady places under the trees within a mere 15 acre (c. 6 hectare) Victorian park (United Kingdom). Could this have been an attempt at humor, rather than a valid edit? Aronro (talk) 05:53, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

"The term may refer to areas as small as a few square feet (for example a garden bed) or as large as many square miles." Kortoso (talk) 17:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

This may be a an attempt to humor because micro climate usually refers to an area of a country or less but not at least a few square meters so this can not be taken as a valid edit rather than a code of humor.

Samyajit Poddar (talk) 07:08, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

An edit

See this edit; I agree the article needs work but large-scale changes should be discussed on the talk page if you're not sure about wiki-markup and the conventions of Wikipedia. Have a look at Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia for more information when/if you decide to come back. Graham87 02:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Ya it's necessary to be discussed here but this large scale change is more or less to the point so cease this topic. Samyajit Poddar (talk) 07:02, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Too many "Me Too"s

I'm sure we all want to comment on our own local microclimates, but please try to hunt up some attribution to go with your contributions. Kortoso (talk) 17:28, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Microclimate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141217143746/http://astrobiology.nasa.gov/nai/reports/annual-reports/2010/uh/permafrost-in-hawaii/ to http://astrobiology.nasa.gov/nai/reports/annual-reports/2010/uh/permafrost-in-hawaii/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928011150/http://www.natmus.dk/graphics/konferencer_mm/microclimates/pdf/shiner.pdf to http://www.natmus.dk/graphics/konferencer_mm/microclimates/pdf/shiner.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.76.113.84 (talk) 19:33, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

citations needed for calling these areas microclimates

I've tagged all the assertions of microclimate that either didn't have any source at all or only had sources to weather statistics, which aren't enough to support the assertion an area is a "microclimate." We need someone calling these places microclimates in order to include them here. --valereee (talk) 13:18, 19 January 2020 (UTC)