This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Microlift glider article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tainter, Thank you for the fast review and response. I will review the suggested webpages before making the recommended changes.
A small group of glider pilots, researchers and designeers are attempting to make technological break-throughs so that more people can enjoy gliding on more days; that is, glide on days with weak lift. Broader knowledge about microlift will help more people to get involved.
Revision Completed
editI have performed additional research to provide authoritative support for facts represented in the article. Adjustments to the text have been performed to achieve a NPOV.
Format
editI have performed a basic overhawl of the page in order to "Wikify" and aproach the reqired standards, such as reference list & reference formats, image sizing, intrawiki links, etc. There are few references listed and may use some more. I have reorganized the text taking care to not change the information already there. Lastly, I have moved the title from Microlift to Microlift glider, as the article is not about the atmospheric phenomenon of microlift but about a new kind of aircraft. Very interesting article and hope I see it grow with updates and refinements. BatteryIncluded (talk) 16:04, 23 March 2008 (UTC)