Talk:Microsoft Academic Search

Latest comment: 1 month ago by 196.74.145.207 in topic L'histoire des atomes

Untitled

edit

I'll try to organize some materials and revise this articale recently.Luogang.china 12:03, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Done. Luogang.china 08:02, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

  1. REDIRECT User talk:DGG/Libra (Academic Search)

Needs cleanup

edit

Sounds overly promotional; reads too much like a how-to; apparently mostly written by Microsoft as indicated by the reference to "our editors". Nurg (talk) 05:26, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.cnblogs.com/takeitandgo/archive/2011/03/12/1981978.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. RockMagnetist (talk) 03:53, 28 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Name

edit

The URL on my computer is http://academic.research.microsoft.com, not "search." Kdammers (talk) 05:46, 11 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

There was a logo for the (now defunct) Microsoft Academic Search that I uploaded per the guideline on logos, which allows low-quality images of logos for identification. It has been replaced by an image that is described as "own work", and as far as I can tell, is not anyone's logo. To me, that seems pointless, so I am reverting the changes. @Alexdwade: if you have a good reason for making this change, can you please explain it below? RockMagnetist(talk) 02:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Multiple Pages for essentially the same tool

edit

Do we really need separate wikipedia pages for Microsoft Academic and Microsoft Academic Search? Can we just move the Microsoft Academic Search content to a History section of Microsoft Academic? I'm pasting this same text on the Talk page for Microsoft Academic too.Sharp-shinned.hawk (talk) 18:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I have the same (or similar) question. I actually just joined this project (I work for Microsoft Academic). My manager and I stumbled across this page and were confused - we thought the page had not been updated in forever. Then I found the other page (Microsoft Academic). It is not clear at all on this page that Microsoft Academic is a continuation of Microsoft Academic Search. Since I work for Microsoft, I don't want to edit our own page, but can anyone help? How would you fix this confusion? Thanks,Mvorvoreanu (talk) 18:29, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Microsoft Academic Search. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Introduction of sales information system

edit

In research way 41.79.122.83 (talk) 13:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

L'histoire des atomes

edit

يجب أن يم 196.74.145.207 (talk) 04:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply