Talk:Microsoft Office 95

File:Office 95 Pro.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Office 95 Pro.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 17 November 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:03, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Infobox parameters

I think the following infobox parameters should not be included, for the following reasons:

• "latest release version" - this parameter should not be there in its current form, which is with a source. None of the other parameters are sourced directly in the infobox. This parameter has a specific source associated with the information in it in the body of the article.
• "standard" - this parameter is poorly documented and as such I do not think it appropriate to simply guess at its intended use. Additionally, it is not sourced anywhere in the article.
• "AsOf" - this parameter is also poorly documented and as such I do not think it appropriate to simply guess at its intended use. Additionally, this parameter would require repeated updating of the article.

Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 13:25, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Memory requirements

Boutros55 (talk) 13:26, 28 August 2013 (UTC) The article gives the memory requirements for Office 95 as being 8MB. For Office Standard, this is correct. Access, however, as we discovered when it was released a month or two after Office Standard had a higher minimum requirement of 12MB or 16MB (sorry, I forget which) with pre-purchasers offered a refund if this change from the previously announced hardware requirements was a problem.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Microsoft Office 95. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ssuet.edu.pk/taimoor/books/0-7897-0568-0/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:54, 2 April 2016 (UTC)